In my last post, I wrote to you about CAFOs and swine. One particular hot button topic in the realm of swine operations is the use of gestation crates. These are not to be confused with farrowing crates, which are crates that are used when the sow is giving birth. Farrowing crates keep the piglets safe because mothers have the tendency to roll over on them and kill them without noticing. Farrowing crates allow the piglets to still suckle on the mother without running the risk of getting rolled over. Gestation crates are metal enclosures that hold a pregnant sow through the duration of her pregnancy. She can move forward and backward but she cannot turn around. Those against the use of gestation crates argue that it is inhumane to keep an animal in such a small enclosure and unable to interact socially with other animals. Proponents of gestation crates will tell you that it is easier to monitor the health of the animal, give her the exact amount of food she needs to have a healthy pregnancy, and that they reduce the amount of litters lost. I think the jury is still out on this one. Even as a member of the animal agriculture community, I can see how the general public has a hard time wrapping their heads around this one. But I can also see the benefits to individual attention given by using gestation crates. The best compromise I have found so far are free-access gestation crates. They have little doors on the back that drop down when the pig enters the stall, and if they want to exit the stall and return to the open area, all they have to do is back up and the door will open. The funny thing about these, though, is that even given the free choice to an open area, you're still going to find most of the sows in their crates. Which makes me wonder, what environment do they actually prefer? Are we forcing them into open areas when they would rather be closed in? Or are we closing them in against their will? I don't think the debate about using crates will ever be put to rest. But I can tell you from firsthand experience that, crates or no crates, American pork producers are working every day to create the best product possible with the best animal environment possible.
One intricacy of livestock production that has people worried is how livestock produce greenhouse gases that could be impacting our environment. This is a very legitimate concern, as the world's production of these gases increasing daily. However, agriculture as a whole, not just livestock production, only accounts for 9% of the total greenhouse emissions, a mere one-third of what the transportation industry produces. But still, there's always room for improvement! Researchers are always working to find the best combination of supplemental minerals and feed combinations that will lower the amount of methane produced by livestock. And we are getting pretty good at it! One way we are currently reducing emissions is the fact that we now can produce far more product with a far smaller animal population than we could throughout the 20th century, thanks to feeding techniques and breeding strategies that help us get more product from each animal. Compared to 1960, today's egg prod...
So, what's COOL these days? Your meat isn't. Are you confused yet? COOL stands for Country of Origin Labeling. This was a law that the USDA had established that required the labeling of meat sold in the US to state the origin of the animal. However, the World Trade Organization ordered the USDA to reverse this rule, stating that it violated US trade agreements with Canada and Mexico. They claimed that it put an undue burden on producers and shippers to keep perfect record of the path each animal took from birth to slaughter. With the rule in place, a label on your meat could potentially read "Born in Canada, Raised in Mexico, Slaughtered in USA." So why would we want our meat to be labeled with country of origin? Well, first, the American consumer likes to know that the product they are paying for is raised to a certain standard of quality. Second, it is good for the American meat producer because the consumer is more likely to purchase a product with a label stating...
One subject you will hear a lot about these days is animal rights and animal welfare. But these two terms mean very different things. Animal welfare is treating animals ethically and providing the best habitat and health you can to meet their physiological needs. Animal rights is the belief that animals have the same rights as humans and deserve to be treated the same. Livestock producers are greatly concerned with animal welfare. It is one of the key components in providing a quality product and maintaining a stable business. If the animals are not treated well and kept healthy, they will not provide a quality product at slaughter. If you can't market a quality product, you cannot stay in business. It is that simple. So even if a livestock producer wanted to treat his animals poorly, he would not last very long in this business. It's a great thing, then, that most livestock producers LOVE what they do and love their animals. This is not a business you stay in if you hate it. T...
Comments
Post a Comment